Home The Sell Sider Two Ways Publishers Can Improve Programmatic Supply Efficiency

Two Ways Publishers Can Improve Programmatic Supply Efficiency

SHARE:
Emry DowningHall, SVP of Programmatic Revenue and Strategy at Unwind Media

The challenges facing publishers are formidable.

For all the advancements in ad tech, publishers are still more rewarded for squeezing another ad on a page or lighting up a duplicate supply path than creating a monetization experience that extends a user session. 

While no legitimate publisher aspires to work with myriad partners or overwhelm their pages with ad placements, if the economic realities and outcomes of our industry continue to reward these practices, it raises the question:

What would a catalyst for meaningful change look like? Judging by the standing-room-only crowd at Sharethrough’s recent Green Media Summit, sustainability in ad tech may be a formidable candidate.

Though I remain a climate neophyte, it doesn’t require seasoned expertise to understand that decisions I make about ad layout, SSP partnerships and bidstream efficiency make a difference on my carbon footprint as a publisher.

Conceptually, this makes sense, but it can be a divisive conversation for publishers that reasonably equate removal or reduction as detrimental to business outcomes. Whether packaged as an environmental benefit or demand path optimization, elimination may be the purest form of supply-path optimization. But, unfortunately, it’s not always the most realistic.

What about improvements that come at no cost to revenue? Is it possible to improve your efficiency as a publisher while also reducing your carbon footprint?

Focusing on requests

Ad requests begin the ad-serving process. They are publisher signals sent to enabled SSPs that define a user and ask for an ad. SSPs take those signals and send “bid requests” to enabled DSPs. This happens per user, per ad unit across every active exchange and supply path that a publisher runs. As a result, the compounding effects can be dramatic, especially in instances of multihop reselling.

While SSPs and DSPs are built to handle large volumes of “queries per second,” there is a financial and environmental cost associated with being inefficient – one that will be increasingly important to optimize as advertisers, DSPs and SSPs fight against increased supply-chain costs and output.

With the goal of reducing total ad requests to SSPs, we’ve been running tests over the last 10 months. So far, two results stand out as having significant impact. These features are integrated via Prebid and require a small amount of code to monitor and manage bid requests and auctions. They have significantly reduced requests while showing no measurable impact to monetization.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Test 1: No ads if idle 

Like most publishers, we refresh ad placements only when in view. We wondered what would happen if we added an additional requirement that the user also must be actively engaged for an ad to qualify for refresh.

To test this, we implemented a change on page that started counting defined events like click, scroll or touchstart. If the counter extends beyond 60 seconds, the user is deemed idle, and we stop requesting ads. 

Prior to testing, I was confident we would reduce requests with this change. What gave me pause was that the potential reduction of total monetized impressions could lead to a negative impact on revenue.

The actual results were encouraging. Desktop bid requests were reduced by 20%, while average desktop viewability improved by 14%. Without any changes to variables like flooring, unpaid impressions per game (impressions with bids that failed to clear our price floors) decreased by 11%, while paid impressions increased by 5%. 

Test 2: Smarter request 

For this test, we wanted to understand what would happen if we used SSP participation signals to throttle our ad requests.

The concept was simple. By ad unit, if Prebid SSPs fail to respond with a bid above our dynamic price floor on three consecutive auctions, we stop requesting that SSP partner. We check again a few minutes later – if they return a qualifying bid, they resume ad serving.

Since this initiative applies to all sessions, we saw an even greater increase in efficiency. Total ad requests decreased by 30% while SSP fill rates (note, this is not the same as win rate) improved by over 50%.

A step toward greater efficiency

In aggregate, these features reduced total ad requests to our SSP partners by more than 50% without any measurable revenue impact. Although that headline lacks the punchiness of a case study touting an immediate revenue increase, these changes have made our inventory more compelling due to our increased efficiency.

As publishers, we tend to prioritize changes that show immediate revenue lift. But it seems reasonable that the benefit of increased efficiency wouldn’t immediately appear in the top line, even if it could have positive impacts down the road. 

PubMatic, for example, cites publisher supply efficiency as one of their evaluation criteria for inclusion in curated marketplace deals.

And Rocky Moss, CEO of ad quality firm DeepSee.io, points out that DSP SPO efforts would benefit from a function that removes inefficient supply paths, “and publishers can also benefit from policies that reduce bid volumes via inefficient supply paths.” 

There’s also a case for user-facing benefits. With fewer ad requests being made, a website is more responsive, especially deep in a session.

Obviously these changes are not a panacea to ad tech’s carbon emission challenges. But they can represent a step forward and are worth exploring for publishers looking to improve overall ad serving efficiency. 

Whether you consider these features the development of more conscious supply or demand path optimization under the veil of sustainability, the label matters far less than the impact their adoption represents.

The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Follow Emry Downinghall and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

For more articles featuring Emry Downinghall, click here.

Must Read

Why Vodafone Is Giving Out Grades For Its Creative

One way to get a handle on your brand creative is to, well, grade your homework, according to Anne Stilling, Vodafone’s global director of brands and media.

Inside The Fall Of Oracle’s Advertising Business

By now, the industry is well aware that Oracle, once the most prominent advertising data seller in market, will shut down its advertising division. What’s behind the ignominious end of Oracle Advertising?

Forget about asking for permission to collect cookies. Google will have to ask for permission to not collect them.

Criteo: The Privacy Sandbox Is NOT Ready Yet, But Could Be If Google Makes Certain Changes Soon

If Google were to shut off third-party cookies today and implement the current version of the Privacy Sandbox, publishers would see their ad revenue on Chrome tank by around 60% on average.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Platforms Are Autogenerating Creative – And It’s Going To Be Terrible

This week, we’re diving into the most important thing in advertising – the actual creative – and how major ad platforms are well on their way to an era of creative innovation. Actually, strike that. I meant creative desolation.

Comic: TFW Disney+ Goes AVOD

Disney Expands Its Audience Graph And Clean Room Tech Beyond The US

Disney expands its audience graph and clean room tech to Latin America, marking the first time it will be available outside the US. The announcement precedes this week’s launch of Disney+ with ads in Latin America.

Advertible Makes Its Case To SSPs For Running Native Channel Extensions

Companies like TripleLift that created the programmatic native category are now in their awkward tween years. Cue Advertible, a “native-as-a-service” programmatic vendor, as put by co-founder and CEO Tom Anderson.