Home The Sell Sider The Precipice of Peril: Publishers And Ad Tech Face A Harsh 2024

The Precipice of Peril: Publishers And Ad Tech Face A Harsh 2024

SHARE:
Scott Messer, Principal & Founder, Messer Media

While 2023’s return to fiscal responsibility made for rough waters, it will pale in comparison to 2024.  

Google Chrome will deprecate third-party cookies, Privacy Sandbox will dominate the conversation, and media will continue having a major crisis, as years of removing friction between consumer and content has cratered the value chain. 

Despite 2023’s turmoil, there’s positive economic momentum heading into 2024. Inflation is slowing, supply chains are cranking, and unemployment is historically low. Sure, marketers are still noncommittal about budgets, but there’s a major election and an Olympics ahead to help goose YOY comparisons. 

However, publishers will need more than a few hot ad verticals to turn their fortunes around. Add in inevitable showdowns between DSPs, monopolies and governments, and it’s clear 2024 won’t be a breeze. Here are eight trends worth watching:

1. The traffic jam

Publishers are reeling from two years of cuts to referral traffic. The tenuous publisher-platform symbiosis is on life support as AI uncouples search from sources and the newsfeed shrivels into a wasteland. Cookie collapse, harsh regulation and the growing ad tech tax will burden publishers further. 

Publishers will focus on distribution amidst traffic woes, and the content pendulum will swing toward long-form coverage where perspective and depth create distinction. 

And though vertical publishing continues to be vulnerable to AI, original or creative categories like comedy are poised for a resurgence.

As ad tech complexity skyrockets and profitability shrinks, so does margin of error for publishers. It will be possible to do more with less in 2024, but you need solid ad tech and reporting foundations before you can draw insights and make optimizations.  

2. DCaaS: Deal curation as a service

To navigate the open market jungle, you need trusted sherpas. Curation is coming back after years of publishers bearing great costs for custom solutions and expensive sales teams, only to be met with buyer apathy.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

In 2024, publishers will become more comfortable with “curation houses.” But beware of hucksters who are just reselling programmatic. Good curation houses should have direct buyer relationships, sellers in the market and a clearly articulated value proposition.

3. Bedlam of bid enrichment

Once a service only offered within DSPs and SSPs, bid enrichment is moving onto publisher pages. Publishers are calling bid enrichment vendors to “look up” the user and return any associated IDs. Those IDs are typically placed into the publisherprovidedID array in local storage, where the SSP can grab them to enrich the bid request.

However, there are two major issues on the horizon: bid washing and fee structure.

DSPs cannot differentiate the source of an ID and must rely on OpenRTB objects. The enrichment vendor is likely using a probabilistic match to return what could be a deterministic identifier. There’s no harm if these IDs remain in OpenRTB’s extended ID (EID) array, where buyers expect publisher-provided IDs. But moving them into the userID or buyer.userID arrays is a big no-no.

Publishers need to be wary of misrepresentation and ID laundering. But the jury is out on whether this actually has any negative effect on campaign integrity. 

Plus, bid enrichment deal mechanics need an overhaul. Often structured as “lift deals,” a publisher will pay a rev-share to the vendor on all enriched requests. But no one knows if the enrichment actually sold the impression, and the vendor is incentivized to enrich as many requests as possible. 

Some publishers employ several vendors to enhance coverage. Does a publisher pay each of them 5%? Not a chance. Instead, enrichment vendors should extract their value from the buy side or the owners of each ID.

4. Addressability parable: CTV edition

Addressability, automation and chasing inventory liquidity are great for growth and opening markets. But DSPs are built for disintermediation that will commoditize you into oblivion. 

The boom in ad-supported streaming content (thanks in part to subscription fatigue) is causing a glut of undifferentiated supply. So inventory owners are moving more toward addressable auctions and opening more demand paths. 

But ad tech will crowd your supply chain, and smarter DSPs will force you to adjust floor prices down. As other services move to fully programmatic, buyers will challenge the need to reserve your inventory. More streamers will start new programmatic sales divisions. 

Take a lesson from the digital web: Reducing friction by going to the open auction may save costs and bring in easy money, but it erodes CPMs and disintermediates you from buyers. 

5. Tending to attention 

Attention as a value metric is no better than its predecessors, and it only compounds the measurement problem by combining metrics that aren’t fully baked. 

Attention is a complicated black box that heavily favors buyers (fine) and blinds publishers (boo). Even if the industry could coalesce around some threshold of attention (like with viewability), it will fumble how it is applied.

Pre-impression filters will drive up prices and reduce availability of worthwhile inventory. Post-impression filters will create “wasted” impressions and cut publisher payouts. Signal loss will exacerbate attribution problems, and correlations of performance and attention will be incomplete at best.

If you’re not concerned yet, wait until your team asks for $100K per year to license an attention vendor.

6. PAAPI’s Trojan Horse: Adsense

As Chrome deprecates cookies, the Protected Audiences API (PAAPI) is supposed to handle privacy-safe retargeting for systems using Chrome’s APIs. Google brands like Adwords and DV360 will support these APIs, allowing millions of customers to continue pumping DV360 full of remarketing dollars. 

Presumably, publishers must adopt PAAPI auctions to get these campaigns. Client-side multi-bidder auction value will immediately plummet, and non-Google SSPs will shrink down to their “unique demand” size. 

With PAAPI now entrenched in publisher websites, other DSPs will follow adoption to avoid losing clients, and DV360 will continue transacting directly with publishers. This will be fine for many DSPs, but the largest ones bristle at such an outcome.

7. Standalone DMPs

2024 will be the most challenging year yet for standalone DMPs, as the reality of monetizing their own data continues to elude publishers. DMPs need to be more realistic about the publisher’s opportunity. 

Many adjacent vendors now offer DMP-esque services for an incremental fraction of the cost. Further, curation houses and the ubiquity of contextual solutions are kneecapping the standalone proposition. 

However, the impending cookie collapse could upend the buy side’s bring-your-own-data workflow and put the publisher DMP back on center stage.

8. Whomp whomp, LoMP

The ANA Programmatic Media Supply Chain Transparency Study features this graph showing the full “cost waterfall” of transaction costs and loss of media productivity (LoMP) caused by nonviewable, IVT, nonmeasurable and MFA inventory.

This chart is not just a demonstration of costs, but also the opening of a new product marketing flank. DSPs and SSPs are relatively fixed in their transaction cost frameworks, so expect them to harp on reducing LoMP with new features (that they’ll probably charge for).

DSPs won’t be able to weed out inefficiency alone, and many partners will not agree on their methods (such as how to avoid MFA ). But, hopefully, these efforts accelerate the flight to quality and a strengthening of seller relationships.

The silver lining

Despite all this, or perhaps because of it, 2024 could still be a great year.  

Sure, we’re in for lots of change and uncertainty. But if you get lost this year, focus on strengthening your relationship with the consumer. 

Now let’s go crush 2024. See you in the spreadsheets!

The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Follow Scott Messer and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

For more articles featuring Scott Messer, click here.

Must Read

Why Vodafone Is Giving Out Grades For Its Creative

One way to get a handle on your brand creative is to, well, grade your homework, according to Anne Stilling, Vodafone’s global director of brands and media.

Inside The Fall Of Oracle’s Advertising Business

By now, the industry is well aware that Oracle, once the most prominent advertising data seller in market, will shut down its advertising division. What’s behind the ignominious end of Oracle Advertising?

Forget about asking for permission to collect cookies. Google will have to ask for permission to not collect them.

Criteo: The Privacy Sandbox Is NOT Ready Yet, But Could Be If Google Makes Certain Changes Soon

If Google were to shut off third-party cookies today and implement the current version of the Privacy Sandbox, publishers would see their ad revenue on Chrome tank by around 60% on average.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Platforms Are Autogenerating Creative – And It’s Going To Be Terrible

This week, we’re diving into the most important thing in advertising – the actual creative – and how major ad platforms are well on their way to an era of creative innovation. Actually, strike that. I meant creative desolation.

Comic: TFW Disney+ Goes AVOD

Disney Expands Its Audience Graph And Clean Room Tech Beyond The US

Disney expands its audience graph and clean room tech to Latin America, marking the first time it will be available outside the US. The announcement precedes this week’s launch of Disney+ with ads in Latin America.

Advertible Makes Its Case To SSPs For Running Native Channel Extensions

Companies like TripleLift that created the programmatic native category are now in their awkward tween years. Cue Advertible, a “native-as-a-service” programmatic vendor, as put by co-founder and CEO Tom Anderson.